Daily Archives

2 Articles

Uncategorized

Blog Post #5

Posted by Essence Santiago (She/her) on

In Mulvey’s “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, she discusses the idea of scopophilia in cinema and how cinema plays a role in sexual pleasure. According to Mulvey, scopophilia is the pleasure of looking where the person gains sexual pleasure from the use of sight, very similar to the concept of vouyerism. Cinema allows for the concept of scopophilia flourish due to the fact that cinema allows the viewer an opportunity to be in this anonymous space where they can watch the others, others being the people on the screen, without them knowing so. Typically, in cinema, this sexual pleasure is established through the female roles within the film. These women are then labeled as the temptress for both the male characters and the viewers to draw a larger audience to the film. This normalizes in today’s films that women in cinema are always portrayed as a love interest or an object of the leading man’s desires. A great example of this is Sofia Vergara. An incredibly gorgeous Latina actress that is well known for her looks in film. Historically in cinema, women roles tend to exist to make the leading male character appear “good” and add to his social status, in the film, by essentially acting as a trophy that emphasizes his masculinity.  Mulvey discusses that another way women are illustrated as inferior to men is through the phallocentric system. This suggests that women envy men because we physiologically lack a “penis” thus we are unable to have a fetish. However, in media this portrayal of inferiority in women is adopted and continues to be carried on as a tradition.

Additionally, Mulvey relates scopophilia to Lacan’s Mirror Stage. Mulvey explains Lacan’s idea of recognition and misrecognition. According to Lacan, misrecognition is where we as the person looking at our image in the mirror, although we aspire to be that image that we see, we tend to mistake ourselves to be that image. Mulvey applies this concept to cinema by stating, “… demands identification of the ego with the object on the screen through the spectator’s fascination with and recognition of his like” (1958). This supports my belief of sexual desires being rooted from the ego, meaning in my opinion the sexual desires of men are stimulated through the ego of men because their ego is boosted through the validation and praise that is gained through winning over a girl way out of their league. Essentially, ego and sexual desires have a common ability to produce this form of fantasy for men as their sexual impulses are projected onto the actors in a film. This now allows for the spectator to have an experience where a sense of control and satisfaction through the actions of the protagonist as if they, the spectators, were to be performing the acts themselves. The characteristics of a male actor now represents an idealized version of themself, rather than merely serving as a figment of imagination. 

Uncategorized

Freud Fetishism

Posted by Ashley Taylor (anything) on

Freud’s exploration of fetishism offers a fascinating glimpse into the complexities of human psychology, particularly in the realm of desire and neurosis. In his essay on “Fetishism,” Freud delves into the meanings of fetishes for both the person who has it and his analyst, the relationship of fetishism to neurosis, and the underlying psychological mechanisms at play.

To the person who has a fetish, it holds a deeply personal and often symbolic significance. It serves as a source of comfort, a talisman against anxiety, or a means of connecting to a desired object or person. For the analyst, the fetish represents a manifestation of unconscious desires and conflicts, offering insight into the individual’s psyche and underlying neurosis.

Freud sees fetishism as closely related to neurosis, viewing it as a form of psychic defense mechanism. He suggests that fetishes arise as a way to resolve the Oedipus complex, particularly the castration anxiety experienced by young boys. By fetishizing an object associated with the mother’s body, such as a shoe or piece of clothing, the individual attempts to deny the castration threat and maintain a sense of wholeness.

According to Freud, every fetish ultimately signifies the absence of the penis in women, symbolizing the castration anxiety that underlies male fetishism. The fetish serves as a substitute for the missing penis, providing a sense of security and pleasure. However, Freud notes that this solution is fragile, as it relies on the individual’s ability to maintain the illusion of the fetish’s power.

The fetish incites such a powerful desire because it represents a fantasy of control over anxiety-provoking thoughts and feelings. By investing the fetish object with symbolic meaning, the individual seeks to master their fears and desires, albeit temporarily.

Freud encounters several barriers in his analysis of fetishism, including the resistance of the fetishist to explore the underlying meaning of their fetish. He expresses hesitation in confronting the taboo nature of fetishism and the uncomfortable truths it reveals about human sexuality and desire.

Freud explores the divided attitude of the fetishist through examples that illustrate the ambivalent nature of fetishism. The fetishist simultaneously desires and disavows the fetishized object, maintaining a complex relationship of attraction and denial. Freud analyzes the way the fetishist treats the fetishized object as a means of managing this ambivalence, often engaging in rituals or behaviors that reinforce the fetish’s significance.

In conclusion, Freud’s examination of fetishism sheds light on the intricate interplay between desire, anxiety, and neurosis. The fetish serves as a fascinating case study in the ways individuals navigate their innermost conflicts and desires, highlighting the complexities of human psychology.

Skip to toolbar