Freud, dreams, and rebuses
In case anyone’s not clear on the “rebus” analogy in Freud’s stuff on dreams, here’s an example: 

In case anyone’s not clear on the “rebus” analogy in Freud’s stuff on dreams, here’s an example: 
It’s that time. Here are the instructions for your midterm and a link to the template you’ll use to write the exam and upload to Dropbox:
Here’s the template. Good luck, everyone!
Here’s some more Gramsci for your cultural diet. The podcast The Dig recently featured the great Michael Denning, Professor of American Studies at Yale, who has written Gramscian analysis of US literature and culture for the past 30 years, including his magnificent book The Cultural Front. As a bonus, the second episode includes a riff on Althusser’s borrowing from and divergence from Gramsci about 3/4 of the way through. It’s a lot, but there’s a TON of stuff relevant to our course in here.
Gramsci & Hegemony w/ Michael Denning
Your browser does not support the audio tag. Featuring Michael Denning on Antonio Gramsci. Part one of an expansive two-part interview.
Gramsci, Organization, Crisis w/ Michael Denning
Your browser does not support the audio tag. Featuring Michael Denning on Antonio Gramsci. The second of a two-part interview.
Well, whaddya know: Antonio Gramsci made the news this week. The Chronicle of Higher Education is the premier “trade journal” of academica, where academics and university workers read about current goings-on. Here, the cultural studies critics Bruce Robbins is rehearsing an argument with the literary critic John Guillory, whose recent book Professing Criticism has spawned a vigorous debate on the role of politics in humanities teaching and writing in higher ed.
As you can see, Robbins invokes Gramsci’s distinction between “organic” and “traditional” intellectuals in order to clarify his objections to Guillory’s argument about the need for scholar/professors to work in a “self-authorizing” and autonomous way, rather than align themselves with political institutions and arguments (e.g., supporting Democratic Socialists of America or righting against the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe). Robbins believes that, although academics have generally been “traditional” intellectuals in Gramsci’s sense, aligned with a “neutral” institution (academia) that serves something “higher” than the partisan pursuits of capitalist accumulation and party politics, since the 60s, many academics have been plausibly “organic” to fundamental social groups.
We’ll talk more about these categories tomorrow, but I thought it was cool to find an unfolding argument in the ether that’s so perfectly targeted to our reading!
I’ll go over this in class today but wanted to share for anyone who misses or wants to review the review:
As promised, I wanted to alert you to a few things I’ve posted in the past for students with regard to Marx and Engels:
Be sure to submit anything appropriate you have to the department’s annual awards. Cash money!!
Prizes & Awards
Every year the English Department offers a variety of prizes and awards for both undergraduate and graduate students. The prizes and awards program provides a wonderful opportunity for students to have their work recognized in the fields of literary analysis and criticism; linguistics and rhetoric; creative fiction, non-fiction, and poetry; personal essay; and drama.
I’ve just created a screencast that demonstrates how to post (and find other resources) on the Commons:
Uploading
No Description
It may take a few minutes to upload (it’s Tuesday at 2pm right now) but will help those who are not yet familiar with WordPress and the Commons.
As promised, we’ll spend a few minutes on Friday talking through Jonathan Culler’s very useful introduction to literary theory. Here are the slides:
What is Theory?
What is Theory? Some motifs from Jonathan Culler’s work Cite: Culler, Jonathan. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. 2nd ed., Oxford UP, 2011,
Hi 306/301 students:
Two quick things as we move towards Opening Day on Friday:
1. You are encouraged, but not obliged, to read Jonathan Culler’s introduction to “theory” here. I’ll digest some of its main ideas on Friday, but I think you’ll find it useful to orient yourselves before we dive in the deep water with Nietzsche for Tuesday.
2. You are also welcome (but not required) to introduce yourselves to me and to each other via Padlet, using the whimsical prompt I’ve created.